According to the
New York Times and
TelevisionBroadcast.com this week, Chicago's Fox32 newscasts are now using product placement from McDonalds on their broadcasts, with cups of Mickey D's coffee sitting on the desks in front of the morning news anchors.
This doesn't sit well with me (not the coffee itself, the product placement of it). Product placement has been part of movies for many years and has recently become popular with TV shows, especially Reality TV shows. I don't have a problem with product placement inside of any visual entertainment medium, as long as it doesn't detract from the show itself. It is a wise way of finding alternative advertising dollars in tough economic times. HOWEVER... television newscasts are different. We expect our news sources to be unbiased, honest... pure. Granted, some news outlets have crossed that line in recent years, most notably Fox News Channel, but overall, our wants out of our news sources stay the same. Product & logo placement during a newscast is wrong. It takes away from the seriousness of the news. It puts in doubt that the news broadcast would be able to honestly report a problem with the McDonalds Corporation while purposely sipping on a McD's iced coffee. What is Exxon/Mobil decided to have their logo hang behind the anchors? Would the anchors then be able to honestly speak of rising oil prices? Of course not. It implies that the news outfit and even the anchors themselves support & endorse the product. That's good for the product, but bad for the anchors.
Commercial breaks during a news broadcast are different. The viewer expects commercials in between segments. They understand that the station or network is airing these spots, not the newscast & anchors themselves. There is a clear divide between the anchors & the ads. With product placement, there is no longer a divide. It cheapens and lessens the newscast and all involved. Is the few hundred dollars they received that week, worth the potential loss of viewer's respect? Is it worth the possible FCC fines & legal expenses that would follow? I can't see how it could be.
Now I know that the Fox News parent company crosses the line of "pure" newscasts on a daily basis with their Republican-leaning broadcasts. However, most thinking viewers know this
BEFORE tuning in and have no problem with it. Fox News is simply "preaching to the choir" with much of their output. The Fox-owned local news stations across the country do not do this. They have always stayed neutral. They are still politically neutral, but with some of them now accepting product placement, like Chicago's WFLD-TV, it makes it seem like they have lost some of that neutrality.
Rick Kaempfer's excellent novel from last year,
Severance, jokingly talked about the Nascar-ization of newscasts, with product placement taking over. The joke isn't so funny when it comes true.
Let's hope this is just a poor advertising decision on WFLD's part and not the shape of things to come.